While there is much debate about using the names of crazies who commit mass murder, in this case I am choosing not to use the names of three people associated with the border militia movement who stand accused of killing a nine year old girl in Southern Arizona. The little girl who was gunned down was named Brisenia Flores. Brisenia Flores! Brisenia Flores!! Brisenia Flores!!!
Not the name you were expecting?
I am aghast that Brisenia’s name isn’t on the tongue of every mother in this country. A child, a little girl filled with promise, hope, and potential was gunned down in her home along with her father in a home invasion in Arivaca, AZ in 2009. Her mother is alive only because she played dead after being shot, called 911, and shot one of the intruders after they returned.
The trial in her murder has started and we hear (as in national talking head coverage) nothing of it? Why? The violent nature of life on the border may or may not have had anything to do with the now infamous January 8th attempted political assassination of Gabrielle Giffords and 18 others, 6 of whom died. People want to believe that. But this trial certainly portrays a violent and obviously mentally deranged group of individuals who are very much part of life in Pima County, Arizona.
Do we hear nothing because there is no debate possible about motive? Is the obvious motive one that no one in the U.S. media wants to look at? Is it because a white woman appears to be behind the murders? Is it because the little girl and her daddy who were brutally executed in their home had darker skin than the people who murdered them?
The least coarse and provocative account of the shooting and arrests I can find to inform you, accurately, about the whole gruesome occurrence is from February 4 on All Things Considered by NPR.
The trial is in recess until mid-week and is still in the jury selection and instruction phase of the trial process. Arizona Daily Star reported on January 25th about the opening arguments. The Daily Star reported on January 17th about the intricacies of the case and likely arguments to be used by both sides.